Skip to content

Category archive for: NSF

Revised NSF PAPPG – February 25, 2019

Posted in NSF

Below is a link to the updated PAPPG (NSF 19-1), which is effective on February 25, 2019.

https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg19_1/index.jsp

Here are a few changes that should be noted regarding proposal preparation:

  • Subawards, has been updated to clarify that the description of the work to be performed by the subaward must be included in the project description.
  • Types of Proposals, specifies that “RAPID”, “EAGER” and “RAISE” must be included in the proposal project title. The language has been updated to indicate that these proposal types are not eligible for reconsideration.
  • Proposal Font, Spacing and Margin Requirements, has been updated to specify that fonts not listed in the PAPPG may be used for mathematical formulas, equations, or when inserting Greek letters or special characters.
  • Synergistic Activities, has been revised to specify that a list should include up to five distinct examples that demonstrate the broader impact of the individual’s professional and scholarly activities that focuses on the integration and transfer of knowledge as well as its creation.

You can find a full list of significant changes and clarifications at:

https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg19_1/sigchanges.jsp

If you are planning a submission to the National Science Foundation, please carefully read the update in its entirety.  Please be advised that non-compliance with these changes could result in your proposal being returned without review.

Do not hesitate to reach out to your pre-award contact with any questions or concerns.

NSF Update: New Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) – Effective Date Delayed

Posted in NSF

The implementation date for the revised NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 19-1), which was scheduled to become effective on January 28, 2019, has been delayed. NSF will post a new implementation date on the NSF website as soon as practicable. In the interim, the current version of the PAPPG (NSF 18-1) applies. (https://www.nsf.gov/shutdown/grantees.jsp)

2019 NSF ENG CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop

Posted in NSF

An NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop will be held on April 1-2, 2019, in Washington, DC. The workshop aims to provide individuals who plan to submit a CAREER Award proposal to a program in the Engineering Directorate with a CAREER proposal review experience and a forum in which they can interact with NSF program directors and recent NSF CAREER awardees.  Workshop participation is by invitation and limited to 300 participants. Participants will be selected from those who submit complete applications.

Application Deadline
January 21, 2019

Selected Applicants Receive Invitation to Join the Workshop
February 4, 2019

Click here for more details.

NSF PAPPG Changes and Proposal Compliance Checking Updates – January 29, 2018

Posted in NSF

Below is a link to the PAPPG (NSF 18-1) Policy Changes and Proposal Compliance Checking Updates Coming to FastLane and Research.gov on January 29, 2018.

https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.jsp?t=0&idx=2

Here are a few significant changes regarding proposal preparation:

  • Collaborators and Other Affiliations Information – Please be sure to use the most up to date NSF COA template, which changed in January 2018.

https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/coa.jsp

  • Project Description – “Intellectual Merit” should now be specifically identified as a separate section.
  • Budget Justification – The page limitation has now been increased to 5 pages.

If you are planning a submission to the National Science Foundation, please carefully read the update in its entirety.  Please be advised that non-compliance with these changes could result in your proposal being returned without review.

Do not hesitate to reach out to your pre-award contact with any questions or concerns.

National Science Foundation Formatting Guidelines

Posted in NSF

Below are the National Science Foundation (NSF) formatting guidelines as outlined in the newest Proposals& Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) for proposals submitted on or after January 29, 2018.  The full PAPPG can be found at:

https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf18001

In the last few months, during administrative reviews, we have noticed documents that are not following these formatting guidelines.  This has become increasingly important as NSF have implemented automated format checks at initial proposal compliance review.  Please be advised that non-compliance could result in your proposal being returned without review.

Some common issues deal with 1) the number of lines per vertical inch, 2) margin size, and 3) font type and size.  In particular, we have noticed these issues with files that originate in LaTeX and Google Docs.  Please double check your formatting settings.

Be sure to review the guidelines carefully, and do not hesitate to reach out to your pre-award contact with any questions.

Format of the Proposal

Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the guidelines established in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. The Proposal Preparation Checklist (Exhibit II-1) may be used to assist in this review. The checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. It is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared.

  1. Proposal Pagination Instructions

Proposers are advised that FastLane does not automatically paginate a proposal. Each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file must be individually paginated prior to being uploaded to the electronic system.

  1. Proposal Margin and Spacing Requirements

The proposal must conform to the following requirements:

a. Use one of the following typefaces identified below:

  • Arial9, Courier New, or Palatino Linotype at a font size of 10 points or larger;
  • Times New Roman at a font size of 11 points or larger; or
  • Computer Modern family of fonts at a font size of 11 points or larger.

A font size of less than 10 points may be used for mathematical formulas or equations, figures, table or diagram captions and when using a Symbol font to insert Greek letters or special characters. PIs are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable.

b. No more than six lines of text within a vertical space of one inch.

c. Margins, in all directions, must be at least an inch.

These requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation.

  1. Page Formatting

Proposers are strongly encouraged to use only a standard, single-column format for the text.

The guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements; however, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. Small type size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small type not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for NSF to return the proposal without review. Adherence to type size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller type or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal.

(National Science Foundation Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide, 18-1)

 

Guidelines for Participant Support Costs

Posted in NSF, and Uncategorized

Participant support costs (PSC) are defined by the National Science Foundation as “direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with meetings, conferences, symposia or training projects.”

PSC are those costs used to pay program participants small non-compensatory stipends; possibly reimbursement of travel costs or other out-of-pocket costs incurred to support attendance at a workshop, conference, seminar, symposia or other short-term training or information sharing activity. The purpose of participant support funding is to enable and encourage individuals to attend conferences or training programs without financial burden. The expenses may be paid for directly or as a reimbursement made to the individual. Participant support cost should not be considered as compensation for labor or work performed on a deliverable task.

Examples of acceptable participant stipends are:

  • Conference Attendance: A highschool teacher participating in a conference aimed to educate instructors on how to integrate STEM curricula in K-12 classrooms
  • NSF REU Supplements ONLY: WPI receives an award from the NSF that includes an REU component. The REU component allows the PI’s lab to support undergraduate student positions during the academic year over the course of the three-year grant. The students will be mentored and will assist with various research projects, e.g., media preparation, plant tissue culture, cloning, and mutant analysis. The student support would be considered participant support costs.

A participant cannot be:

  • A “Human Subject” whom you collect data on
  • An employee of the institution
  • Advisory board members
  • Interns with a “paid appointment”
  • Guest speakers
  • Anyone who has a deliverable or is primarily providing a service to the project

These costs would be placed in “Other Direct Costs” instead.

 

You can download a PDF copy of these guidelines here: WPI Participant Support Guidelines

Limited Submission Opportunity

Posted in NSF

The Letter of Intent (mandatory) deadline for the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) Program is December 6, 2017.

The solicitation has not been posted yet, but you can find information about the program and this year’s timeline at

https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505015&WT.mc_id=USNSF_180&WT.mc_ev=click

The NRT is a limited submission program and thus an internal review process is requrired.  An eligible organization may participate in two proposals per competition. Participation includes serving as a lead organization, non-lead organization, or subawardee on any proposal.

Faculty members interested in submitting a proposal should provide by November 13, 2017:

  1. a brief (1-3 pages) abstract of the project and
  2.   a budget outline with accompanying narrative explanation

Please send materials to resadm@wpi.edu

Feel free to contact Antje Harnisch or VPR Vernescu with any questions you might have.

 

NSF CAREER Workshop – April 18th

Posted in NSF

NSF Career Award
This workshop provides a wonderful opportunity for faculty members to gain valuable insight into the NSF CAREER program, as successful WPI CAREER award recipients discuss the proposal submission process and life with a CAREER award.  In addition, there will be a discussion on the proposal review process.  The main goal of the workshop is to provide an interesting and useful forum for faculty, where experiences with WPI CAREER award recipients will be exchanged and questions can be discussed. Professors Sarah Olson (Mathematical Sciences) and Nima Rahbar (Civil & Environmental Engineering) have graciously agreed to lead the workshop this year. They, along with additional CAREER-winning faculty members will participate on the panel.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017
12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
George C. Gordon Library Conference Room 303

National Science Foundation Update: Collaborator Template

Posted in NSF

The National Science Foundation is initiating a new pilot on submission of Collaborators and Other Affiliations (COA) information. Effective April 24th 2017, NSF will require the use of the spreadsheet linked below as a template for identifying COA information. The content requirements specified in the spreadsheet are consistent with Chapter II.C.1.e of the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. The spreadsheet has been developed to be fillable, however, the content and format requirements must not be altered by the user. This spreadsheet must be saved in .xlsx or .xls format and directly uploaded into FastLane as a Collaborators and Other Affiliations Single Copy Document. It should be noted that the template has been tested in Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets, and LibreOffice. FastLane will convert the uploaded .xlsx or .xls files to .PDF. Using the .xlsx or .xls format will enable preservation of searchable text that otherwise would be lost. It is imperative that this document be uploaded in .xlsx or .xls only. Uploading a document in any format other than .xlsx or .xls may delay the timely processing and review of your proposal.

We have updated the template on our Proposal Development page, and you may also view the new policy and template here.

Please contact your Office of Sponsored Programs administrator with any questions.